Skip to content
Female athlete on a training field
The Problem

Girls tear their ACLs 4–8× more than boys — in the same sports.

This is not a mystery. It's a measurable, well-documented pattern. What's missing isn't evidence — it's the systems to act on it.

I'm a
Explore the knee

Click the hotspots. See what breaks — and what prevents it.

This isn't a diagram to read. It's a diagram to interrogate. Every marker unlocks the mechanism and the countermeasure.

How to read this

Four modifiable risk points

Every hotspot marks a structure or pattern that responds to structured neuromuscular training. Select one below — or tap its pin on the diagram — to read the mechanism.

Correct vs at-risk

Drag the divider. See the difference.

Two landings after the same jump. One protects the ACL — one loads it. Coaches trained by G-MIP can spot this in real time on the sideline.

Landing · compare
Neutral landingValgus collapse
HipKneeToe line
HipKneeToe line

Neutral landing

  • Knee stays over the second toe
  • Hips and glutes soak up the force
  • Both legs bend evenly

Valgus collapse

  • Knee drops inside the toe line
  • Twisting load shifts onto the ACL
  • Often worse when tired
Basketball player in a deep, low cut on the court
Cutting and landing load the knee most
Soccer player icing her knee on the sideline
Too many seasons end on the bench
Athletic trainer checking a player's knee
Early checks catch small problems
By the numbers

Why we can't wait

Every statistic is a season lost, a scholarship at risk, and a young athlete asking why nobody warned her.

Relative Risk

Change the conditions. Watch the risk change.

Structured neuromuscular training can cut relative risk by 50%+. Move the toggles to see what that looks like across sports and age groups.

Sport

Training program

Age band

Male athletesFemale athletes — selected sportFemale athletes — other sportsRelative risk vs. male baseline (1.0)

With no prevention program, Soccer stays at baseline risk for 15-17 female athletes. Try “Structured” to see the change.

Why female-specific?

Four factors. One system.

Not one of these is destiny — they're just realities the system has to design around. Pick a factor to see how G-MIP addresses it.

Wider pelvis, larger Q-angle, and different femur-to-tibia geometry create force vectors that concentrate stress at the knee — especially during single-leg landings and rapid direction changes.

  • Q-angle averages 4–7° larger post-puberty
  • Smaller intercondylar notch reduces ACL clearance
  • Load pathways favor valgus collapse without training
The Real Gap

It isn't a knowledge problem.

It's an implementation problem — the exact kind that community-scale programming can solve.

Research–Practice Gap

Peer-reviewed prevention protocols exist. Most coaches have never seen them.

Unequal Access

Athletic training and rehab resources are inconsistent across schools and zip codes.

Tool Deficit

Coaches want to help. They rarely have standardized, ready-to-run materials.

Growing Participation

More girls playing means more injuries unless systems scale with them.

Beyond the Body

Injuries have downstream costs.

Season loss, scholarship risk, mental health impact, dropout from sport — all measurable, all preventable.

Mental Health

Injured athletes report significantly higher rates of depression and anxiety during recovery.

Sport Dropout

A serious injury during adolescence sharply raises the likelihood of quitting sport altogether.

Financial Cost

ACL reconstructions and rehabilitation carry a lifetime cost estimated in the tens of thousands per athlete.

This is exactly what G-MIP was built to solve.